LYCOS RETRIEVER 
Wikipedia: Information
built 643 days ago
Wikipedia articles include both knowledge typical of printed encyclopedias as well as relatively recondite subjects, such as information on small towns, minor sports figures and celebrities, and popular culture. For example, each of the 493 Pokémon characters has an individual article.
Source:
Wikipedia does not require that its contributors give their legal names or provide other information to establish their identity. A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site.[65] Although some contributors are authorities in their field, Wikipedia requires that even their contributions be supported by published and verifiable sources.
Source:
Wikipedia is widely praised for its incredible breadth, covering subjects, sometimes in great depth, that would never appear in any encyclopedia, online or print. There are so many "eyes" looking at an entry that erroneous information is often caught rather quickly. However, Wikipedia is ... disparaged because people can make edits without divulging any of their credentials or experience in the subject. Of course, this is the case with any information on the Web. In addition, if vendors see comments about their category of products, nothing stops them from editing a definition that tilts it toward their particular expertise.
Source:
Wikipedia, About, Google … the point of all of them is to help people find information. If any of them were doing a particularly good job of it, you wouldn’t see sites like findingDulcinea and Mahalo jumping in to fill that gaping hole.
Source:
[I]f you do use language or information from Wikipedia, you must cite it—to do otherwise constitutes plagiarism. The advice here is not to hide what Wikipedia contributes to your ideas, but rather to move beyond Wikipedia and write from a more knowledgeable, expert stance.
Source:
MORE ABOUT
Information