LYCOS RETRIEVER
Video Surveillance: United States
built 290 days ago
According to Frost & Sullivan, Pelco was chosen for this award due to its status as the premier manufacturer in the video surveillance market and its ability to increase revenues at a very strong rate in the market. The winning company in this category is perceived to exhibit outstanding management, high growth, and positive social and economic impact on local and national communities and customers. Exceptional customer service is noted as crucial to success, coupled with the ability to combine technology and successful strategic initiatives.
Source:
Boundless makes IP-based digital video surveillance over existing public wireless networks practical. Boundless avoids flooding wireless networks with video without sacrificing the quality of recorded video. Mobile video surveillance uploads over cellular networks are now practical, for not only stationary and temporary installations but ... [F]rom speeding vehicles.
Source:
Many businesses in the United States have invested heavily in the new video surveillance technology to protect products and to promote safe workplace and consumer environments. A recent nationwide survey of a wide variety of companies found that 75 percent utilize CCTV surveillance.42 Private sector CCTV surveillance technology is operated in a wide variety of industries: industry/manufacturing, retailing, financial/insurance/banking, transportation and distribution, utilities/communications, health care, and hotels/motels.
Source:
The solution centers on ShiftWatch(R), a state-of-the-art audio and video surveillance system manufactured by A4S Security. ShiftWatch recording systems use industrial components designed to withstand harsh operating environments often found in security applications.
Source:
[T]he use of continuous video surveillance occurs on public streets. California courts have been reluctant to expand tort liability to cover an individual who knowingly exposes herself to the public view.61 In fact, in Aisenson v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc.,62 a California court held that the videotaping of an individual on a public street did not constitute an unreasonable intrusion into that person's solitude. The court stated that
Source: