LYCOS RETRIEVER
Gambling: Betting
built 605 days ago
Gambling victimizes the poor. Gambling leads to embezzlement, bribes, extortion, treason, suicide, and corruption of college and professional athletes. Crime often results from victims trying to recoup gambling losses. Those who can least afford it usually gamble the most. Gambling exploits the weaknesses of individuals. Gambling and poverty go hand in hand.
Source:
This restriction significantly limits a state's ability to control Internet gambling under the IGPA. For example, in the Granite Gate case previously discussed, a federal court in Minnesota could issue an injunction against the Internet gambling business which prohibits the Nevada company from transmitting gambling information into only Minnesota. However, since the server (located in Nevada) on which the company's web page is being hosted cannot discern into which state the information is being transmitted, the effect of the injunction would be to prohibit the Internet gambling business from transmitting gambling information to any state -- including those where it may be legal to participate in on-line gambling. This effect would be directly contrary to the explicit prohibition in the Act that the injunction not prevent the transmission of information into any state other than the one where the court is situated (in this case, Minnesota). Consequently, the ability of an individual state to obtain an injunction against a non-resident Internet gambling site is virtually nonexistent. [176]
Source:
Gambling increases crime. Gambling always attracts racketeers and mobsters. Gambling increases the number of murders, assaults, robberies, crimes of violence of all kinds, etc. The underworld thrives on gambling. Police cost increase.
Source:
Using this test, the Ninth Circuit in Valley Broadcasting concluded that the government could not prohibit radio and television stations from broadcasting gambling advertisements. [213] First, both parties agreed that the activity being advertised, gambling, was neither unlawful nor misleading [214] since it originated in Nevada where gambling was legal. Thus, as long as the state where an Internet gambling business is established allows such activity, then the first prong of the Central Hudson test would be satisfied.
Source: